雅思写作动物类题目详解--一边倒写作方法

　　野生动物是否应该被保护的题目最近又一次被雅思写作提及，对于这类表达同意或者反对的题目，一边倒的写法应该怎样写，完全反对该怎么写? 下面小编带大家梳理雅思写作中动物类一边倒文章的写法。

　　Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

　　第一个步骤是决定同不同意，还是部分同意。我的建议是完全不同意。我不认为这个题目我们可以选部分同意。

　　接下来，让我们组织一下四段的内容：

　　1.开头段： 题目复述(保护动物正确的)，然后回答问题(完全不同意)

　　2.第一段理由：为什么不同意。比如说保护动物是我们的责任,动物有生活在地球上的权利

　　3.第二段理由： 为什么不同意。比如说我们用很多资源去保护动物，但这并不算浪费资源

　　4.总结段: 重复观点/总结我们的答案

　　OK.接下来是最重要的了：论点。你能想想第二段第三段我们能列举哪些论据吗?

　　给你一个开头段的范例：

　　开头段(话题+一般性答案)

　　Some people argue that it is pointless to spend money on the protection of wild animals because we humans have no need for them. I completely disagree with this point of view.

　　总结段(重申我们的答案)

　　In conclusion, we have no right to decide whether or not wild animals should exist, and I believe that we should do everything we can to protect them.

　　请注意:

　　开头段和总结段要短小精悍，直截了当。如果你要得高分，要在主体段两段下功夫。

　　下面是9分范文：

　　Wild animals have no place in the 21st century,so protecting them is a waste of resources.To what extent do you agree or disagree?

　　Some people argue that it is pointless to spend money on the protection of wild animals because we humans have no need for them. I completely disagree with this point of view.

　　In my opinion,it is absurd to argue that wild animals have no place in the 21st century. I do not believe that planet Earth exists only for the benefit of humans, and there is nothing special about this particular century that means that we suddenly have the right to allow or encourage the extinction of any species. Furthermore, there is no compelling reason why we should let animals die out. We do not need to exploit or destroy every last square metre of land in order to feed or accommodate the world`s population. There is plenty of room for us to exist side by side with wild animals, and this should be our aim.

　　I also disagree with the idea that protecting animals is a waste of resources.It is usually the protection of natural habitats that ensures the survival of wild animals, and most scientists agree that these habitats are also crucial for human survival. For example, rainforests produce oxygen, absorb carbon dioxide and stabilise the Earth’s climate. If we destroyed these areas, the costs of managing the resulting changes to our planet would far outweigh the costs of conservation. By protecting wild animals and their habitats, we maintain the natural balance of all life on Earth.

　　In conclusion, we have no right to decide whether or not wild animals should exist, and I believe that we should do everything we can to protect them.