GMAT作文要写多少字才行？

　　参加过GMAT考试的小伙伴们，对GMAT作文的认知如何?GMAT作文满分的两个重要因素，一是质量，一是数量，这里的数量就是字数的要求，达不到要求的字数，即是文采再好，也是无济于事的。今天留学360专家就为大家整理一下GMAT作文字数的要求。

　　GMAT作文要想获得理想的分数除了要掌握一定的技巧和方法还要注意自己的字数。GMAT写作并不是字数越多越好，相反如果你的文章华而不实，言之无物，那分数肯定高不了。接下来小编就GMAT作文要写多少字为大家做详细介绍，希望对大家的GMAT写作备考有帮助。

　　GMAT作文字数要求

　　GMAT考试官方对GMAT作文的字数并没有明确地要求。但即使如此，考生也不要以为字数多就能分数高，因为这样的做法可能会适得其反。即使AWA写作没有规定明确的字数，但是据统计，大多数的高分作文字数还是集中在400+到550左右。考生只要能够对找出的逻辑错误给出全面深刻的反驳即可，没必要无话找话。但前提是考生一定要对题干中的逻辑错误理解到位，并尽可能的把里面所有的逻辑错误全部找出来。

　　GMAT作文写作的目的是为了将你的观点清晰的表达出来，并指出题干中论证的不足之处。所以在练习的时候，考生要注意段落之间的衔接，不要让它被孤立，否则会为你的写作减分。论述时保证每段在80字左右即可，用两到三句话把论点表达清楚即可，不要显得冗长。

　　如何判断自己的作文字数

　　在prep的作文界面，一行平均有18-20个单词，为简化计算，按每行20个单词来计算。注意，在这里，无论是完整的一行，还是只有几个单词的一行，都记为单独的一行，用来简化计算。凡是一行，都按20个单词来计算。这样，我们可以得出：三行的段落60个单词，四行的段落80个单词，五行的段落100个单词，以此类推。通常我们会写会写4-5个段落，建议每段不要少于3行，也不要要多于6行。有了这些数据，一眼扫下来，基本自己写了多少字就很清楚了。

　　另外大家在备考阶段就要注意自己的写作字数，练习时可以在电脑上打字做实验。最好使用GMAT写作的模拟界面进行，这样练习几篇以后大家对自己的作文字数基本就能够很好的控制了。建议大家在练习把握字数的同时注意提升自己的打字速度，不要让速度影响了文章的正常完成。

　　GMAT作文满分范文展示

　　In this argument the author concludes that the Apogee Company should dose down field offices and conduct all its operations from a single, centralized location because the company had been more profitable in the past when all its operations were in one location. For a couple of reasons, this argument is not very convincing.

　　First, the author assumes that centralization would improve profitability by cutting costs and streamlining supervision of employees. This assumption is never supported with any data or projections. Moreover, the assumption fails to take into account cost increases and inefficiency that could result from centralization. For instance, company representatives would have to travel to do business in areas formerly served by a field office, creating travel costs and loss of critical time. In short, this assumption must be supported with a thorough cost-benefit analysis of centralization versus other possible cost-cutting and/or profit-enhancing strategies.

　　Second, the only reason offered by the author is the claim that Apogee was more profitable when it had operated from a single, centralized location. But is centralization the only difference relevant to greater past profitability? It is entirely possible that management has become lax regarding any number of factors that can affect the bottom line such as inferior products, careless product pricing, inefficient production, poor employee expense account monitoring, ineffective advertising, sloppy buying policies and other wasteful spending. Unless the author can rule out other factors relevant to diminishing profits, this argument commits the fallacy of assuming that just because one event (decreasing profits) follows another (decentralization), the second event has been caused by the first.

　　In conclusion, this is a weak argument. To strengthen the conclusion that Apogee should close field offices and centralize. This author must provide a thorough cost- benefit analysis of available alternatives and rule out factors other than decentralization that might be affecting current profits negatively.